CFP Language Resources and Evaluation Journal, entitled “Under-resourced Languages, Collaborative Approaches and Linked Open Data: Resources, Methods and Applications”

Submissions for a Special Issue of the Language Resources and Evaluation Journal, entitled “Under-resourced Languages, Collaborative Approaches and Linked Open Data: Resources, Methods and Applications”.

Important: More detailed information will be made available in September 2014. For more information please contact the guest editors.

PRELIMINARY SUBMISSION DATE: November 15, 2014

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS
Under-resourced languages are generally described as languages that suffer from a chronic lack of available resources, from human, financial, and time resources to linguistic ones (language data and language technology), and often also experience the fragmentation of efforts in resource development. This situation is exacerbated by the realization that as technology progresses and the demand for localised languages services over digital devices increases, the divide between adequately- and under-resourced languages keeps widening. Given that most of the world’s almost 7000 languages are not adequately resourced, much work needs to be done in order to support their existence in the digital age.

Although the destiny of a language is primarily determined by its native speakers and broader cultural context, the technological development of an under-resourced language offers such a language a strategic opportunity to have the same “digital dignity”, “digital identity” and “digital longevity” as large, well-developed languages on the Web.

The Linked (Open) Data framework and the emerging Linguistic Linked (Open) Data infrastructure offer novel opportunities for under-resourced languages. On the one hand, Linked Data offers ways of exposing existing high quality, albeit small, language resources in the Semantic Web and, on the other hand, allows for the development of new state-of-the-art resources without necessarily having to rely on the availability of sophisticated language processing support.

This special issue arises from the imperative to maintain cultural and language diversity and from the basic right of all communities, languages, and cultures to be “first class citizens” in an age driven by information, knowledge and understanding. In this spirit, this special issue focuses on three strategic approaches to augment the development of resources for under-resourced languages to achieve a level potentially comparable to well-resourced, technologically advanced languages, viz. a) using the crowd and collaborative platforms; b) using technologies of interoperability with well-developed languages; and c) using Semantic Web technologies and, more specifically, Linked Data.

We invite original contributions, not published before and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that address one or more of the following questions by means of one or more of the three approaches mentioned above:

• How can collaborative approaches and technologies be fruitfully applied to the accelerated development and sharing of high quality resources for under-resourced languages?

• How can such resources be best stored, exposed and accessed by end users and applications?

• How can small language resources be re-used efficiently and effectively, reach larger audiences and be integrated into applications?

• How can multilingual and cross-lingual interoperability of language resources, methods and applications be supported, also between languages that belong to different language families?

• How can existing language resource infrastructures be scaled to thousands of languages?

• How can research on and resource development for under-resourced languages benefit from current advances in semantic and semantic web technologies, and specifically the Linked Data framework?

GUEST EDITORS
Laurette Pretorius – University of South Africa, South Africa (pretol AT unisa DOT ac DOT za)
Claudia Soria – CNR-ILC, Italy (claudia.soria AT ilc DOT cnr DOT it)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE
Sabine Bartsch, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
Delphine Bernhard, LILPA, Strasbourg University, France
Peter Bouda, CIDLeS – Interdisciplinary Centre for Social and Language Documentation, Portugal
Paul Buitelaar, Insight Centre for Data Analytics, NUIG, Ireland
Steve Cassidy, Macquarie University, Australia
Christian Chiarcos, Frankfurt University, Germany
Thierry Declerck, DFKI GmbH, Language Technology Lab, Germany
Mikel Forcada, University of Alicante, Spain
Dafydd Gibbon, Bielefeld University, Germany
Yoshihiko Hayashi, Graduate School of Language and Culture, Osaka University, Japan
Sebastian Hellmann, Leipzig University, Germany
Simon Krek, Jožef Stefan Institute, Slovenia
Tobias Kuhn, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
Joseph Mariani, LIMSI-CNRS & IMMI, France
John McCrae, Bielefeld University, Germany
Steven Moran, Universität Zürich, Switzerland
Kellen Parker, National Tsing Hua University, China
Patrick Paroubek, LIMSI-CNRS, France
Taher Pilehvar, “La Sapienza” Rome University, Italy
Maria Pilar Perea i Sabater, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
Laurette Pretorius, University of South Africa, South Africa
Leonel Ruiz Miyares, Centro de Linguistica Aplicada (CLA), Cuba
Kevin Scannell, St. Louis University, USA
Ulrich Schäfer, Technical University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden, Bavaria, Germany
Claudia Soria, CNR-ILC, Italy
Nick Thieberger, University of Melbourne, Australia
Eveline Wandl-Vogt, Austrian Academy of Sciences, ICLTT, Austria
Michael Zock, LIF-CNRS, France

#CALLabstracts EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum

This cites “The types and effects of native speakers’ feedback on CMC Language, Learning & Technology article.

This exploratory computer assisted-language learning (CALL) study used a computer-mediated communication (CMC) interface to allow English as a foreign language (EFL) writing students in classes at two universities to give each other anonymous peer feedback about essay-writing assignments reacting to selected news stories. Experts also provided feedback review. Follow-up questions were facilitated by the interface.

The students felt that they benefitted from the instructional design, but found that the peer review focused most on things like grammar whereas the experts focused on organization and structure, making the expert feedback more valuable. Researchers found that more complex issues discussed in the source news articles resulted in lower outcome scores, based on a rubric, than did source material simpler issues.

The study also compared performance of students with higher and lower ability and evaluated the quality of the review comments. Conclusions and recommendations for practice are provided. This study is significant because it used CALL/CMC technology to provide online interactivity between students and reviewers in an open forum that allowed students to seek follow-up clarification to the comments of reviewers. The review process, therefore, was not a one-way anonymous communication from reviewer to student but rather allowed interactive discussion of the points and suggestions made by the reviewers.

DOI:10.1080/09588221.2014.937442

Authors: Wen-Chi Vivian Wua, Emily Petita & Ching-Huei Chenb

Receptive and productive mastery of different text varieties

Receptive mastery of different text varieties increases access to information, while productive mastery increases the ability to participate in varying communities. And if you cannot analyze a variety that is new to you, you cannot help yourself or others learn to master it.  Biber & Conrad (2009:4)

Biber, D. & Conrad, S. 2009.
Register, genre and style. CUP.

CFP: Digital games and language learning: A sociocultural perspective



Digital games and language learning: A sociocultural perspective  (Edited by Dr Mark Peterson and Dr Michael Thomas)

Rationale

In recent years there has been a surge of interest in the use of digital games in many spheres of education. The field of language education has also witnessed an expansion of work in this area (Peterson 2010). Language researchers frequently assert that the use of contemporary digital games in language education is a highly significant development (Sykes & Reinhardt 2012). The current literature suggests that playing many types of digital game may be particularly beneficial for second and foreign language learners (Peterson 2013). In the view of a growing number of researchers, digital games have the potential to provide access to optimal conditions for learning as they provide exposure to and opportunities to use the target language in a highly engaging, authentic and motivating context (Reinders & Wattana 2012; Sykes 2013). The expansion of interest on the use of games has coincided with advances in SLA research that stress the social nature of language learning. As many network-based digital games provide for extensive social interaction between players they have attracted interest from researchers who emphasize the importance of contextual and social factors in SLA (Thorne, Black & Sykes 2009).

Although there has been much discussion of the potential of digital games in the literature, research that explores learner game play is limited and many areas remain unexplored (Reinhardt 2013). Research that investigates the use of digital games from a sociocultural perspective has been conducted (Peterson 2012; Piiranen-Marsh & Tainio 2009; Zheng et al., 2009). However, studies remain restricted for the most part, to small scale experimental research. To date, few studies have addressed learner attitudes, gaming in out-of-school contexts or participation in game-related online communities (Peterson 2013). At the present time there is no dedicated collection that brings together state-of-the-art research on the use of digital games that is informed by sociocultural accounts of SLA. Moreover, there remains a lack of publications that provide classroom practitioners with a resource on which to draw. Through the presentation of theory-based work and studies conducted in the field it is anticipated that this edited volume will inform language educators in the pursuit of best practice.

Call for chapters

The proposed book will be divided into two parts: the first section will include theory-based papers that will provide a comprehensive overview of rationales for game-based learning that are informed by sociocultural accounts of SLA. The second section will focus on applied research and will include papers that report on actual learner game play, in-game interaction, attitudes and participation in game related online communities.

Chapters will be between 5,000 to 7,000 words long and will appeal to language teachers, graduate students and researchers working in the fields of applied linguistics, second language acquisition and the learning sciences. Submissions are encouraged focusing on one or more of the following areas:

Theory of game-based learning
Learner in-game interaction
Learner attitudes
Use of modified games
Gaming in out-of-school contexts
Integration of game-based learning
Learner participation in online game-related communities

Abstract submission and deadlines

Abstracts should be between 300 and 500 words and should be sent to both Dr Mark Peterson (tufsmp@yahoo.com) and Dr Michael Thomas (MThomas4@uclan.ac.uk).

The deadline is July 30th 2014. All proposals should include the following information:

Full name and title of the author(s)
Professional status
Professional address (department, employer, city and country)
Email addresses (home/work)
A short bio of each author (no more than 100 words)

All abstracts will be reviewed and a decision regarding possible inclusion in the monograph will be made within three weeks of receipt. Authors should note that acceptance of an abstract does not guarantee inclusion in the book, as the final chapter draft will be subject to further review.

The first chapter drafts are due on or before January 10th 2014.

Acceptance or rejection of papers is expected to take place within two to three weeks of the above date. Authors of accepted proposals will be sent further guidelines for the development of their chapter in due course. Prospective authors may submit more than one proposal. However, only one chapter can be accepted per individual author.

About the editors

Dr Mark Peterson is associate professor in the graduate school of human and environmental studies Kyoto University, Japan. His research focuses on the use of digital games in language education. He is author of Computer Games and Language Learning  (2013). Among his recent publications include papers in the journals ReCALL, Simulation and Gaming and Digital Education and Culture. Together with Dr Michael Thomas he recently co-edited a special edition of the CALICO Journal (2014) focusing on Web 2.0 and language learning.
http://www.peterson.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/

Dr Michael Thomas is Senior Lecturer in Language Learning Technologies at the University of Central Lancashire, UK, and an affiliated fellow at the Brenkman Center for Internet Studies, Harvard University, for 2013/14. He has taught at universities in the UK, Germany and Japan. His research interests are in task-based learning and CALL and distance and online learning. He is editor of two book series, ‘Digital Education and Learning’ (with James Paul Gee and John Palfrey) and ‘Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching’ (with Mark Peterson and Mark Warschauer). Among his recent publications are Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning (2009), Task-Based Language Learning & Teaching with Technology (with H. Reinders) (2010), Digital Education (2011) and Online Learning (2011).
http://www.uclan.ac.uk/staff_profiles/michael_thomas.php